Despite differences you might think conclusions about which bike was faster would be fairly consistent. But comparing the only two bikes tested by both magazines, this is not the case:

I averaged the positive and negative yaw results from the VeloNews test, since Tour reported values for only one side of the bike.
If you read Tour, and you think low yaw angles are the most important, you rush out and buy a Felt. On the other hand if you read VeloNews you definitely get the Cervelo.
Neither test result was without surprises. The Cervelo at zero yaw was slower even than the Cannondale control bike in that test. Nobody's ever looked at a Cannondale System 6 and walked away with the impression of aerodynamic elegance. In contrast, the Cervelo has a beautifully tapered head tube.
True, the Tour test overlooked the advantage of internally routed cables. But I can't help wonder how consistently the dummy was fit on the bike in each case in the Tour test.
So this sort of bike-to-bike comparison testing is very challenging. Far different than looking at weight difference, where you pop that sucker up on the scale and photo the result. Sure, there's subtleties, like what sizes to compare, and whether to compare naked frames or "modules", but wind tunnel testing is just in a different league.

No comments:
Post a Comment