More 26-inch hardtail success

After the 2010 World Mountain Bike Championships, I posted a summary of the bikes which had won elite world championships and Olympic races 2008-2010. The result: overwhelming superiority of 26-inch hard-tails, with only one exception of the races Christophe Sauser's 2008 world championship on a Specialized Epic dual-suspension. Well, since then "29'ers" have become so popular it's hard to even find high-end 26-inch hard tails in shops in the United States. Even the dual-suspension bikes are switching to "29-inch". There's been a move in Europe towards 27.5-inch "650B" wheels, a size which had previously been associated more with randonneuring, and Ritchey just announced a wheel in that size.

So one would expect given the ubiquity of these wheels and their claimed performance advantage that surely the winner of these most important races in the world, racers in which the riders have access to almost any equipment they want, 29'ers would dominate. I don't follow pro-level mountain biking much, so was curious if this is the case. I'll start with 2011 world championships.

The women's race was Catharine Pendrel of Canada won the women's championship. Here's her bike from Feb 2012 (although I'm not 100% sure it was the same one she rode @ Worlds).

Catharine Pendrel's bike
2011 women's world champion Catharine Pendrel's 2012 bike

Sure enough, it's a 26-inch hard tail.

The men's race was won by Jaroslav Kulhavy of the Czech Republic. Here's a photo from Canadian Cyclist, via Cycling News:

Jaroslav Kulhavy
Jaroslav Kulhavy in the 2011 World Championships
That's another Specialized Epic, this time with 29-inch wheels.

So this morning was the women's Olympic mountain bike race. The winner, Julie Bresset of France. Here's what she rode:


Julie Bresset dominating 2012 women's olympic cross-country

Another point to 26-inch hard-tails.

So my tally is up to 11 races: 3 olympics and 8 world championships starting in 2008. It's a biased selection in favor of duallies since that was the first year a dually won worlds. Yet despite this 26-inch hard-tails are ahead 9 to 2. Both of the two are Specialized Epic full-suspension bikes, the 2008 men's world championship won on a 26-incher, and the men's 2011 world championship won on a 29-incher. It will be interesting to see what happens in the men's olympic race tomorrow.

Comments

djconnel said…
Well, the score is now 26-inch hard-tails 9, Specialized Epic 3.
August 12, 2012 at 7:12 AM
schwa said…
29ers don't make sense with small frame sizes. I know women who race MTB who can't ride 29ers because they just don't fit. It might make sense to keep a different tally for men and women.
August 13, 2012 at 9:57 AM
djconnel said…
True. Results are strongly confounded with sponsor marketing focus, etc: it's rare (team GB in the Olympics, for example) that performance is the only criterion (and curiously, team GB used 26-inch hard-tails). There are women on 29'ers, so if there was a substantial performance advantage to these you'd expect these women would do substantially better. In the end, I the primary conclusions from this little "study" is wheel size doesn't matter much, and that Specialized makes good dual-suspension bikes.
August 13, 2012 at 10:44 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Marin Avenue (Berkeley)

Image
On Saturday, I got an email from Tim telling letting me know that Murphy's Spring Classics was going to start up Marin Ave. I'd missed that. Murphy announces his courses the day before, and indeed it was already well into the night before when the course announcement went out. I'd skipped over the details, jumping straight to middle and end games. Marin? I laughed at the irony, because not long before when he'd told me he was choosing to repeat the Nifty Twn Fifty which we'd done together last year versus selecting Murphy Mack's Stage Mullett two-day, I responded I didn't think I had it in me to ride Marin Ave two years in succession. Well, so much for that. I was committed, so I went downstairs to swap my 11-26 cassette for my Recon 12-27. The name is easily overlooked: "Marin Ave" fails to strike the same impression as, for example, "Redwood Gulch" or "China Grade". But among those in the know, Marin Ave is infamous i
Read more

hummingbird feeder physics

Image
I couldn't figure out how the hummingbird feeder worked. Why didn't it overflow? Forces need to balance, of course. Neglecting surface tension, there liquid level is higher in the inner reservoir than in the feeding chamber, so there must be a corresponding pressure difference. Suppose the pressure in the inner chamber were zero. Then the column height difference would need to be atmospheric pressure / (density of liquid × gravity). But this is over 9 meters! Obviously the height difference is only approximately 1% of this. So the pressure difference inside versus outside is only approximately 1%. The inside is only slightly below atmosphere. So air is getting in. How? Does it diffuse through the liquid? If this were the dominant mechanism, it wouldn't take long for the pressure inside to go from 99% to 99.3%, for example, which should be plenty to push the column of liquid down in the inside chamber and thus push liquid out through the holes. It would over
Read more

Gallium Pro geometry

Image
On Caltrain yesterday, I was surprised to see among the usual set of commuting bikes a SRAM Red-equipped Argon Gallium Pro. The bike immediately stole your attention. The design was one which has been trending: clear-coated carbon with plenty of text detail so the viewer is sure to realize he's gazing upon the result of advanced, proprietary engineering and not at yet another paint job on the same old OEM frames being pumped out of the same old Taiwanese factories. But it worked: the bottom bracket area was huge, the downtube a large-diameter "inverted Kamm tail" design seemingly designed to maximize wind resistance, the top tube a broad, eccentric shape which screamed "vertically compliant yet torsionally stiff". All it lacked were the pencil-think seat stays Cervelo popularized, but this was a machine designed for stiffness over anything else. It seemed dramatic overkill, since the bike was small (the Argon "XS" I suspect). There wasn't muc
Read more